I feel like we are right back where we started both acknowledging a problem but both believing differently as to who's responsible or what is responsible for it. And also what the program's capacity is for improvement. I believe we've been in a debate before on this very same topic and I just don't feel like there's enough new ideas being introduced to rehash it
There's NOTHING NEW to introduce.
Your debate is with the U of ND. I'm merely trying to COURSE-CORRECT YOU IN THAT DIRECTION.
If you're so convinced that this can be "FIXED," TALK TO THE PEOPLE WHO CAN FIX IT.
Do you see anyone in the BROADER ND COMMUNITY who is pushing this issue?
I DON'T THINK SO.
So, what I would be doing if I were you is finding out if your ARGUMEMT is either a DEAD LETTER among those who have the power to implement it, or if, in fact, you are MUCH CLEVERER than any of these people, in which case you might see yourself as owing them the benefit of YOUR SUPERIOR INSIGHTS by contacting them directly and telling them how to run ND'S FOOTBALL PROGRAM.
WHY NOT? YOU HAVE ALL THE DATA AND ZEAL IMAGINABLE.
My own view -- AND IT'S SHARED BY MANY HERE -- is that ND will NEVER approach football the same way as OSU, OU or Bama.
If you have EVIDENCE TO THE CONTRARY, LET'S SEE IT.
I could talk ALL DAY to rocket enthusiasts about the flaws I perceive in Elon Musk's rocketry technology, but unless I talk to him or someone at his company, of what value are my insights.
OF
NO VALUE.
Do you want to EFFECT CHANGE or just keep posting like some GABBER AT THE END OF THE BAR who thinks he can forumlate foreign policy between SHOTS and BEERS?
Honestly, if everyone on this board agreed with you tomorrow, WHAT DIFFERENCE WOULD IT MAKE as nothing would change.
Why is that SO DIFFICULT for you to UNDERSTAND?
I'm not debating you so much as INFORMING YOU that you have NOTHING TO DEBATE unless you take it RIGHT TO THE SOURCE.
Until you do, you're just a BYSTANDER.
The same as the REST OF US.