Not on the ability to transfer. Students may have to sit a year, but as of today the NCAA doesn't require that. Everything is being done exactly by the rules all the parties agreed to. Fans just hate losing good players and seeing rivals get better, so they try to make it wrong for a player to seek to fulfill the life he wants.
This is the problem. The structure is broken. The ones who take advantage are morally compromised. Not illegal but unethical. Kinda like a 50 year old banging an 18 year old it’s nit illegal but morally compromised. You might hit lightening in a bottle but you’re doing it in a way that doesn’t garnish much respect.
So what is your scenario where players are not allowed to transfer to another school? Why is it is unethical to transfer to play for a coach who they think might develop your abilities more? Don't kids go to higher ranked academic schools because they think it will lead to better development towards their goals? Why is this wrong for athletes?
That makes sense; the day college football players are fired for poor performance.
Happens every season. It is called being cut or being benched. You must know players are often told to look elsewhere,
How is being benched the same as being fired? Are they still on scholarship, yes. Are they still getting room and board, and gear, yes.
If you look at it from the point of view of a fan, yes. Many of these players have the goals of playing in college football games and becoming better players. If those goals aren't met by the school, why is it wrong to transfer to another school where those goals can be met? Why is it wrong to play for the coach you want to play for? Players are recruited by specific coaches and if those coaches leave why can't the players? Why is it "unethical" for players and coaches to do what they want to do within the rules everyone agreed to when signing the LOI? Those rules allow for transfer.
No.
Is it wrong to want to play football? If you applied to ND to get a business degree and they put you in social work school, would that be OK since you still were getting a degree?
You're saying a lot of things that I didn't comment on.
The NFL doesn't let players transfer either. I guess the entire sport has the wrong perspective.
Here is my answer from the last time you asked:
I can help you out here. I am here because I enjoy it. I was born in Indiana and root for ND every game except one. In general, but not always, I respond to posts that mention USC. When people have questions, I try to answer them. When people post conclusions like, "LR is an unethical coach." I try to find out if there are any facts to support the statement. So far there haven't been any, but maybe you will be the first.
Why are you? I can't find one post of yours that adds anything to this board
I don't like NIL and I am not confused about treating students like employees, Quite the opposite. I don't see any reason to restrict a player from transferring to play where and with whom he or she likes. Those are the terms the athlete, the coach and the school agrees to. i am not sure why anyone would make up additional restrictions that none of the parties have agreed to.
Every sports league restricts players from leaving and joining teams as they can. Are you saying the NCAAF (of the last few years) is the only one doing it right?
I am at home. Any one who doesn’t like my posts is free to ignore me. What passive aggressive shots have I take at ND. Please list three or four.
You mean the leagues where there are contract requiring a player to remain with a team for a period of time after which they can go where they want? Do LOIs say that?
So now that you get it, if they want the privileges of being professionals then they can take on some of the burdens.
I am afraid you don't get it. Anything the students the school and governing body is fine with me. But that was not the subject of this thread. It was written that students tranfering are unethical and a coach that accepts them is as well. What is unethical about taking an action that all parties invloved agree is proper? Something isn't wrong becuase fanboy stamps his foot and pouts.
I can't tell if you can't see the problem with unlimited transfers or are just ignoring it because it now helps your team.
They are not unlimited . A team can only have 85 total players on rides. Assuming they want to keep some who are already there it isn’t unlimited. ND took three players from the portal so I guess that must be an ethical amount. What is an unethical number.
Are you projecting? I must have asked 30 questions which you ignore. What questions would you like me to answer?
Clay left USC in a death spiral - it is not fair for the new coach to try to use all appropriate resources to reverse that spiral! not fair - not fair!
No. It's Angeli. Its Pyne. Its Moore. Its Avery Johnson. Its flipping a good qb.
