Well, Book sure as hell wasn’t the transcendent QB you argued in post after post after post, etc... until you acknowledged such after the Clemson game. Not arguing arm strength or hand size, etc... but the proverbial bottom line is Book was below average in his ability to complete long throws, especially down the middle; and this is a fatal shortcoming against top tier defenses. Against Clemson in particular, he panicked and vacated the pocket prematurely on numerous plays and never showed the calm to go through his progressions timely to find open receivers. It’s accurate to say ND didn’t have good speed at receiver, etc... but it’s also accurate to say when these receivers did get open on downfield routes that he missed them terribly, such as Boykins twice against Clemson. I don’t agree that he was really good in his last 3-4 starts, but they were wins, and Book deserves a ton of credit for our 12-0 season. As for suggesting that Tua and Book struggled the same against Clemson is a bit like saying hamburger and steak are both meat. Yes, they both struggled, and while they each threw the ball 34 times, Tua passed for 295 yards and 2 tds while Book passed for 160 yds and no tds. Like most here, I watched a lot of football with the playoffs and the major bowl games, and Book was clearly not among the top tier QBs. I seriously doubt he can elevate his game to this level, but experience is a wonderful teacher and perhaps he can. I sure as hell hope so. But I also hope Phil is given a chance to compete to be the starting QB, as we need to put our best player in every position on the field, not just the most experienced.