F+ has Notre Dame at..,
- Thread starter NDinNJ
- Start date
And Colorado at 83! Prime is really taking them places…just this weekend he took them from 72 to 83!13. 😂
BCF Toys - 2024 F+ Ratings
www.bcftoys.com
That's really good to see. Despite the score ND must have done enough peripherally to maintain a top 15 ranking. ND is very much still in the picture.13. 😂
BCF Toys - 2024 F+ Ratings
Coach Prime took over at Colorado after the 2022 season.
Colorado final F+ ranking by year:
2022: 127th (literally one of the very worst teams in all of the FBS)
2023: 75th
2024: 60th (SP+ Projection)
Colorado talent rankings by year:
2022: 63rd
2023: 35th
2024: 31st
Despite all the noise, these are the metrics that really get to the core of the performance of the colorado football program since Deion Sanders took over.
Add to it all the hype/sales/brand exposure colorado has gotten since Coach Prime took over, and his hire has been nothing short of a resounding success.
Last edited:
The only thing that matters at the end of the day is the teams wins and losses.
4-8 last season, most likely the same record this season.
If we went by your rules, Georgia would have been national champions last year, the Dodgers would have won the world series, the Denver Nuggets would have been NBA champions, and the NY Rangers would have been NHL champions.
Do you see how flawed your logic is.
Last edited:
Of course wins and losses is all that matter, but increasing your program's talent base (team talent composite), and increasing the production on the field (F+) correlates to more future wins, more than wins themselves do.
If we went by your rules, Georgia would have been national champions last year, the Dodgers would have won the world series, the Denver Nuggets would have been NBA champions, and the NY Rangers would have been NHL champions.
Do you see how flawed your logic is. The teams that look best on paper don't always win, in fact most times they don't
I dont really follow the NBA or NHL but taking the first two examples (Bulldogs & Dodgers), look at how many games those teams have won over the last several seasons in relation to all other teams.
Even if both teams (Dawgs, Dodgers) didn't seal the deal last season by winning a championship, they've positioned themselves better than all other organizations to win a championship by being the most talented, highest producing teams in both respective sports. Things like small sample size, variance (luck), still play a big role in the outcome of a single series or a single game and no matter how good of a team or program you are, you still need to be lucky too to win a championship in both of those sports.
and Dodgers have zero championships to show for it. 😂 flawed logic. And that's why they play the games dummy
my how your narrative changes when you talk about your man crush
5 wins in 14 games, all against teams with aggregate winning % of .400. 9 losses against teams at .400 or better. Not yet working...and it won't. lol
I dont have a big crush on coach prime lol i simply didn't hate the hire and have been a fan of his behind the scenes coverage through his son's growing youtube channel. I've also commented that ND can learn a lot from the kind of ground up groundroots movement going on through social media regarding colorado football. They are really doing a good job marketing that program, and trust me, things like TV ratings and ticket sales at a place like colorado matter just as much as the wins do.
Last edited:
Similar threads
