Before Kelly arrived, ND looked terrible. SC had their way with us.
Now, that is reversed.
So you would fire a coach after going at minimum,
23-3?
Who would you bring in that has compiled a better record over the last two seasons?
You are not rational.
I wanted him gone after the 4-9 season. However, I was totally wrong about that.
Kelly changed his staff and gave up offensive play calling. Which has given him more freedom to be the Head Coach. He is now able to be more involved with the whole team.
Not many top college coaches or even NFL coaches, are there own Coordinators.
Why were you wrong about that?
First of all I clearly state I wouldn't fire him mid season or did you selectively skip that part like you do most of time whilst reciting a post...
But after going 4-8 and you wanted him gone but now say you were wrong... Why?
Explain this.
You have no idea what could have been if he was dismissed after that juvenile 4-8 season.
What exactly has he won that makes you wrong?
A title? No
A major bowl trophy? No
A playoff appearance? Yes
Get close in a huge road game but still lose? Yep.. He's been doing that is entire tenure.
A competitive showing in a major bowl? Nope
It's been ten years and that has yet to happen. Not even competitive.
So what exactly were you wrong about?
Because he has the program in better shape than..........
Charlie Weis?
Willingham?
I'm not sure how you celebrate being better than those two hires.
Hell Weis and Davie both had a top 5 win to their credit.
BK STILL hasnt done that. 10 years and not once beat a top 5.
Usually the law of averages kicks in but he's defying that.
Simply amazing