This thread was/is talking about opinions on personnel decisions, with what players should be playing; As if coach Rees doesn't know. Nobody on this board knows who should or shouldn't be playing more than the coaches; to think otherwise is stupid.
This is a completely absurd statement.
Outside of yourself
you've no idea who and what real experience any poster here has/had in or around the actual game.
You assume because someone is on a message board they've no experience and or an eye for evaluation.
Tommy Rees is 30 years old. Not coaching for 30 mind you....he's just thirty years of age. Believe this or not but there are some posters here who've had at least as many years involved in the game as Rees has been alive.
Moreover just because someone holds a title of "coach" doesn't mean they're good at it. It also certainly doesn't mean they are perfect.
Look no further than Brian Kelly. Many years experience...much more than TR...yet he started and played (sometimes far too excruciatingly long) the wrong QB.
I'm not at practice every single day but it took me a few passing plays to see how inaccurate Wimbush was. Now to give a chance perhaps his arm was sore...but after a third straight game of sailed throws, errant, short and just off target it was clear to me he was a very poor passer. Crystal.
Do you recall the night game against NC in a bit of drizzle? Wimbush couldn't play so Ian Book had to.
It was immediately clear he was an accurate passer. At least miles more than Wimbush.
Hell the receiver's body language showed an excitement from getting a better, more catchable pass thrown.
Just the QB position alone...which is the most important one...was a complete adventure under Brian Kelly.
Trust me when I tell you but Mr. Rees isn't always right. He's not always wrong but he most certainly isn't always right.
Sorry