dexter is gonna look like he’s fired out of a cannon running the ball next week. You think this offense looked explosive today just wait. My gut right now says we take this momentum and build on it w a good win against Stanford.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We shall see how many carries he'll earn in practice this week.dexter is gonna look like he’s fired out of a cannon running the ball next week. You think this offense looked explosive today just wait. My gut right now says we take this momentum and build on it w a good win against Stanford.
so nauseatingWe shall see how many carries he'll earn in practice this week.
One game at a time. Just keep it going baby
Can we get our 5* Hamilton to play on Sunday?Stanford looked much better in second half. Oregon made some questionable decissions and errors to let the Trees back in the game.
Stanfords receivers loik huge. Not necessarily fast but make good moves and catch balls using their height and big bodies.
I still can’t believe that. Stanford got a gift. Bad coaching all around by Oregon there.I look for a rough game that hopefully we can pull out. That back for Oregon handed them the game at the end with that silly fumble.
I hate Stanford lol. I had a feeling they’d win even when they were getting their ass kicked. Luckiest win I’ve ever seenI still can’t believe that. Stanford got a gift. Bad coaching all around by Oregon there.
Stanford is good I do not think they are as good as Michigan. There D is not there. There offense is going to be dangerous with those large receivers and Love. Hopefully our offense is as good as it was against Wake.
Sorry if you don't understand how things work.so nauseating
Not sure who you were responding to. Thought you had a solid post.I'm a basketball guy. Just looking for some analysis from the football coaches out there. I've watched a lot of football over the years but only played until 9th grade and never coached. So excuuuuuuuuuse me! Used to be okay when a person admitted he or she didn't know something and asked a question of an expert. Guess that doesn't fly in today's culture -- just pretend you know everything and keep texting like the Kardashians..
Right, like both QB's were going to play yesterday. Dexter got one carry last year against GA. I wouldn't trust anything bk saysSorry if I seemed defensive, must've misread the post. Still interested in an answer?!
Hey, good news from Kelly on Dexter: "Dexter's been doing well, if he continues to have the kind of week that he's had the last few weeks, I would expect that he would be able to do something for us this week."
You are so smart, NOT. You are a fricking idiot who thinks he knows.Sorry if you don't understand how things work.
Lets HOPE bk/Long get Dexter the ball. Remember last year when Dexter got the ball ONE time against Georgia? He wasn't hurt that game either echoboy/pendick44 and the other bk apologists.
Their defense isn't as good as Michigan's but they'll play their hearts out because they're playing Notre Dame. Their offense, however, is much more functional than Michigan's was in game one. Costello has way more weapons at his disposal than Patterson did when ND played them and he's much more comfortable in Shaw's system than Patterson was in Harbaugh's when we played the Wolverines. Smith and Parkinson are better than anything Michigan has at tight end. Arcega-Whiteside is a better football player than Peoples-Jones, even if star rating and upside don't reflect that. Irwin is a huge pain in the ass against Notre Dame and Osiris St. Brown gives them a nice speed player in the slot when they've put teams to sleep with heavy sets, a healthy dose of Bryce Love and obnoxious jump ball, after jump ball.
I can see them scoring between 27-34 points in this game... Costello just knows what he's doing and ND's pressures never seem to get home enough against Stanford.
This is will be a nailbiter.
How do you know what hes earned?He'll touch the ball less than 5x, and that's almost exactly what he's earned.
He has to prove he's actually interested in playing a whole game, which he's literally never done.
Wouldn't be surprised if he doesn't touch the ball at all.
way more than you. yes you are correct for once.You are so smart, NOT. You are a fricking idiot who thinks he knows.
comprehension still not your strong suit i see. i posted that his practice this week will likely determine if and how much he plays this week. please try to keep up.How do you know what hes earned?
How do you know what hes earned?
When was the last time Stanford scored 27 points at ND? Luck in 2010? The last 3 times at ND they've scored 17, 14, 13. Shaw does not want this to be a high scoring game, they obviously can if they have to. If ND D plays Typical and our O doesn't have any major turnovers that hand them points I would expect 17-24.Their defense isn't as good as Michigan's but they'll play their hearts out because they're playing Notre Dame. Their offense, however, is much more functional than Michigan's was in game one. Costello has way more weapons at his disposal than Patterson did when ND played them and he's much more comfortable in Shaw's system than Patterson was in Harbaugh's when we played the Wolverines. Smith and Parkinson are better than anything Michigan has at tight end. Arcega-Whiteside is a better football player than Peoples-Jones, even if star rating and upside don't reflect that. Irwin is a huge pain in the ass against Notre Dame and Osiris St. Brown gives them a nice speed player in the slot when they've put teams to sleep with heavy sets, a healthy dose of Bryce Love and obnoxious jump ball, after jump ball.
I can see them scoring between 27-34 points in this game... Costello just knows what he's doing and ND's pressures never seem to get home enough against Stanford.
This is will be a nailbiter.
Yep, I could see 10, 5, or 0. Armstrong looked like an NFL caliber RB vs Wake. Speed, vision, tackle breaking, pad level, finishing off runs, etc. I'm still not confident in davis, he isn't an elite athlete yet he dances around and doesn't finish his runs. Ideally i'd like to see Armstrong be the lead back, spelled by Jones, and Dex/Wimbush take Davis carriers. As the season progresses I'd like to see a 1-2 punch of Dex and Armstrong with Tony being the late game closer.Right, like both QB's were going to play yesterday. Dexter got one carry last year against GA. I wouldn't trust anything bk says
some here think he should just get the bulk of the carries regardless of anything else. dumb, just dumb.Yep, I could see 10, 5, or 0. Armstrong looked like an NFL caliber RB vs Wake. Speed, vision, tackle breaking, pad level, finishing off runs, etc. I'm still not confident in davis, he isn't an elite athlete yet he dances around and doesn't finish his runs. Ideally i'd like to see Armstrong be the lead back, spelled by Jones, and Dex/Wimbush take Davis carriers. As the season progresses I'd like to see a 1-2 punch of Dex and Armstrong with Tony being the late game closer.
I want him to eat into jones/davis reps. By all accounts he's been a great teammate on and off the field, and doing well in practice. Stepherson came in and played right away and I think he had way more issues than Dex, so I have hope he's earned the ability to play a good bit of meaningful snaps vs stanford. I love that he is fresh, and all our backs really should be, but with that he has to control his emotions and aggressiveness and make sure he executes since he will be so pumped up. I'd bring him in the first second you see the offense stalling the tinniest bit. Crowd will go nuts.some here think he should just get the bulk of the carries regardless of anything else. dumb, just dumb.
i just hope he's earned his time.I want him to eat into jones/davis reps. By all accounts he's been a great teammate on and off the field, and doing well in practice. Stepherson came in and played right away and I think he had way more issues than Dex, so I have hope he's earned the ability to play a good bit of meaningful snaps vs stanford. I love that he is fresh, and all our backs really should be, but with that he has to control his emotions and aggressiveness and make sure he executes since he will be so pumped up. I'd bring him in the first second you see the offense stalling the tinniest bit. Crowd will go nuts.
I want him to eat into jones/davis reps. By all accounts he's been a great teammate on and off the field, and doing well in practice. Stepherson came in and played right away and I think he had way more issues than Dex, so I have hope he's earned the ability to play a good bit of meaningful snaps vs stanford. I love that he is fresh, and all our backs really should be, but with that he has to control his emotions and aggressiveness and make sure he executes since he will be so pumped up. I'd bring him in the first second you see the offense stalling the tinniest bit. Crowd will go nuts.
Anyone else feel like Davis should be in the slot? Seems like a better fit for him and potentially a good replacement for Finke next year.
Hey dipshit I asked Friedman the question because he said Dexter would get the ball 5x this week because that's what he earned. I asked how he would know this. Comprendecomprehension still not your strong suit i see. i posted that his practice this week will likely determine if and how much he plays this week. please try to keep up.
Oh really? I didn't notice in the first four games that his pass blocking hasn't improved. Im sure he doesn't want to improve or try to. Are you fricking seriousHis suspension made that pretty clear.
As has his unwillingness to improve in key areas, such as pass blocking, route running, etc.