ADVERTISEMENT

Running out of bunch and tight formations

ND has had plenty of success running out of bunch formations this year.

If the defense wants to load the box then they can. It doesn’t matter which formation the offense uses.
I’d be if I were to count how many times ND has been stopped for negative to no gain on early downs it would > 10 times against MAC schools. I’ll need to rewatch the Purdue game but I thought they spreaded it out more and misdirected?

UNLV Debacle

Yeah, the coach himself made the offer? I guess at UNLV they don't have some glossy, first-rate operation handling all the pay for play NIL deals and everything's all nice and smooth and on the up and up. Somehow that seems appropriate for Las Vegas. It's just in their DNA.

So it's not hard to imagine, whatever it is that went down exactly, LV people, whether coaches, boosters, whoever, totally not being trustworthy or living up to their end of the bargain. And for some private school kid from the Ivy League country to eventually be like, I'm out of here. But he should have known who he was dealing with.
Someone WASN'T WATCHING.

Everybody Watches Everybody

Going on record, ND beats Louisville.

ND will get the W but we will still come away frustrated in the play of RL. This is a game we will depend on his legs and not his arm which has become a disappointing aspect of the '24 season.
Nd is a td favorite, they should win

It’s even possible we win and Riley plays average. Ne must win this game then this is their next shot after game to evaluate qb. The other was halftime at niu

We all hope Riley improves and we start sensing we could be a good playoff team again

Notre Dame - Louisville prediction thread

Starting at the top of this thread my thought was 20-17 and I see you pretty close. Unless RL gets rid of his yips, this will be a low scoring game. The D will have moments of letting UL drive down the field early in the game. RL will start slow but will use his legs to move the O. Mitch Jeter with the field goal with under 2 minutes and the D will need to hold on.

*EDIT: This is UL's first road game.
I think the field goal unit and punt team need to come up with points and field position. One field goal block against NIU contributed to the loss and then the botched hold/snap against Miami cost them 3 points.

3 for 3 against A&M suggests they can do it.

Notre Dame - Louisville prediction thread

Come on yall. Don’t be shy now.

ND 21
Louisville 17

Tough to predict. Louisville seems like they have a good defense. How will the ND OL hold up? Louisville got some huge plays against Georgia Tech so I’m going to hope this won’t happen against ND and that will be the difference. UL still did a good job of playing defense despite Haynes King having a good day. The UL defense very well might stifle the ND offense but ND still put up 20 against A&M.

It’s refreshing to see some under center with two backs that Louisville utilizes.
Starting at the top of this thread my thought was 20-17 and I see you pretty close. Unless RL gets rid of his yips, this will be a low scoring game. The D will have moments of letting UL drive down the field early in the game. RL will start slow but will use his legs to move the O. Mitch Jeter with the field goal with under 2 minutes and the D will need to hold on.

*EDIT: This is UL's first road game.
  • Like
Reactions: FightingIrish44

UNLV Debacle

Sorry, for going off like that. Obviously this is a major hobbyhorse for me. When it really hits you how awful the NCAA is and has been and continues to be, it's pretty heavy-duty stuff.

Even the sort of historical accident of big time sports, with high level BB and especially American tackle football being associated with college attendance, I don't sympathize with it. There was never some golden age of the true student athlete ever. No sublime 'amatuerism' from the mists of America's past. There were ringers playing for the Ivies and for ND and all the big glamour schools pre-WW2, and getting paid on the side. Like George Gipp. And they weren't serious students. Or just guys coming out for the team to do their alma mater proud.

And the official 'student-athlete' designation was a very calculated legal creation, not to mention the cultural mythology, absolutely designed to allow schools to forestall, I suppose, any attempt at or natural evolution wherein players would eventually make a claim on the growing revenue stream of what was at that time I believe the most popular spectator sport in America, other than MLB and a big championship prize fight. And they nipped that very deliberately in the bud. To monopolize all the revenue, under quasi-legal pain of death so to speak. And the rest is or was history, with the little waiver you used to sign where you renounce any sort of right to be paid in any way whatsoever deemed 'professional', and they will expel you with extreme prejudice if you do, so as to always set no possible precedent. And of course they know there's pay for play going on under the table because it was ever thus, and so they selectively put the hammer down from time to time for appearances' sake. Even though everyone does it. And the NCAA, who's supposedly an independent, dignified, impartial actor but really acting solely on the schools' behalf, who of course keep all the money, lords over it all. And that's the name of the game and their raison d'etre.

Pretty dark stuff I would say in the history of America, right under our noses. And yet college sports are held up as some beacon of American wholesomeness. If anything if American universities maintain such robust athletic depts with all these different sports that they're so proud and self-congratulatory about handing scholarships out for, it's because of all that football/basketball money that has to get spent on something. And scholarships are not all that frequent outside of BB and CFB. But they do have the facilities and recruiting budgets and well-paid coaches and all that. And as one last stinging insult, who is it that's getting exploited in this almost overt, hidden in plain sight fashion? Poor blacks. Yet again. So you take all that money that should rightfully be going to black BB and CFB players, and you redistribute it to white soccer and lacrosse and women's field hockey players who get partial scholarships and nice uniforms and equipment for their games nobody goes to or cares about. Nor should care about quite frankly.

Anyways, it sounds like you're on the other side of the aisle on this one. You might even lose interest in the sport altogether. Unless they're willing to keep doing it for free. I'm surprised, you're a like a software designer. I thought they were more progressive than that.
you taint the hundreds of thousands who played over the decades with the handful who did take money.
But then people like you always need to tear down; never build
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT